I'm voting no on the armours. too many updates too fast, looks like the *old school* team is going the same route as rs2 did before eoc came out. the whole point of the game is to be Old School Runescape. i'm not against new updates because it keeps the game alive and brings new players but these kind of updates are over the top. How about focusing on updates that really matter instead of putting so much new crap into the game that we don't need.
please can corrupt dragon also come into the game for f2p players. i remember several years ago when this made the game for me on rs3 i saved and saved till i reached 500k for a corrupt dragon battleaxe and then pkd with it until i cannot remember but then eoc ruined the game and i moved to osrs a few years later only to pk and im sure many other players remember corrupt dragon on f2p pking and would appreciate a poll to bring it back. it will allow more risk to be added to f2p pk pures as cuurently 40k risk for a 2h is too low or 15m for a gilded scimitar is too high. it would require 60 att and allow for new breeds of pures to come about. please consider this thankyou. i am a veteran player on hangman58 acc and have seen man changes this is the first time i myself have asked for an update.
Please make rigour and auguries defensive enhancement corelate with the combat triangle. Rigour shouldn't offer 25% melee defence. Range tanks are quite strong as it stands. It should offer 25% magic defence instead. As should augury not provide 25% range defence. It should provide 25% melee defence.
Fightsaid: adnagaporPsaid: wand still too weak So true, for it being end game content and extremely rare it really needs to be insanely good to keep up with the other new items.
It doesn't have an attack requirement. It's not suppose to replace Staff of the Dead. It's a niche weapon like most of the items they're releasing which makes them only useful in certain situations so they're not best in slot for every situation.
Eghesaid: When are we going to remove the def requirement for piety then? If the other prayers won't have it, there won't be any reason for piety to have it except for the quest requirement of 60 i believe. Let's remove that also then .
The new end-game armour is pretty dissapointing in my opinion. I would choose bandos etc all day over these armours when i go to GWD for example. On other bosses i won't see any benefits either.
Please chance everything or just erase it all.
Why does everyone assume any prayer above Piety should require a defence level to use? It's prayer, not defence. If someone could explain that'd be great.
Yes it may make pures 'stronger' but they'll have to spend around 20M on Prayer levels and buy the scrolls which will be relatively expensive depending on their rarity.
Also it's not like Prayer doesn't raise combat level. They'll have to get an extra 3-10 combat levels depending on their current build & prayer level which would result in them maybe being better off with getting extra Ranged/Magic levels in the first place.
Sorry but I'm voting for no, just started oldschool 2 weeks ago and now I'm already feeling it's going the rs2 to rs3 eoc way.
Why make overpowered gear that cost hundreads of billions for the top tier levels? I'm voting yes for the Prayers to make magic and ranged balanced with Piety.. But the raid armours........ 75 defs that "might" cost billions for the first 2 weeks.. I rather you guys add the PvP armours such as Vesta's etc for the PvP people and Vesta's Spear for Corp PvMing + Stat's Warhammer for PvMing. I rather have the BEST armour and weapon in game to not be able to recharge with money.
Hope someone sees this and understands.
You must be bored spending your time clicking on this spoiler lul.
- Last edited on 27-Aug-2016 21:53:41 by Haru