Forums

Small Suggestions ThreadThread is sticky

Quick find code: 322-323-184-65614746

dupe you

dupe you

Posts: 2,355Mithril Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
We'll a toggle option for no exp gain would be great for accounts that wish to use all of the weapons without fear of unwanted exp.....

This would mix up pking dramatically for the better.....

Also being able to stick to your most desired stats would help many P2P builds like the 1 attack pure build that is supported by range...the only problem there is once the player reaches 68 range that build becomes range based....

PvP clans would be able to better organize themselves with having a limited combat so everyone in the clan can attack all enemies....eg: some of your clan is 55 combat and some are mid 60s....

__________________________________________________________________



Note*
- all quest rewards would still be awarded regardless of the toggle exp option is on or off...

I would love to make a low lvl 6 mage to eat up all the adam arrow collecters at edgenville, & be able to stay at 6 combat without lvling past it & having to re-create a new email & then a new account....

We'll this update wouldn't only affect pure's but lvl 3 skillers that wish to train slayer without gaining combat lvls....

- Gaining no exp would allow pure's to bury bones in the Catacombs of Kourend whilst allowing players to regenerate prayer whilst bury bones.

Update*

Players would now be able to flick though the weapon modes & be able to use defence in better order to protect themselves.This would be great for staker's.
What do you call a
wolf
, that eats another
wolf
....?
For the correct answer ,
click here
.

28-Dec-2016 02:08:08

dupe you

dupe you

Posts: 2,355Mithril Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
F2P QoL updates ( PvP+Skill )



SKILL....


Reduced Yew tree amounts on F2P worlds that aren't skill total...
Increased Yew tree's placed on both F2P skill total worlds ...only 1 or 2 Yew tree's per spot.....

Flesh-crawlers middle room increased in size for both F2P skill total worlds.
Security of stronghold lvl 2,3 & 4 made unavailable unless on a F2P skill total world or future F2P PvP world.

1 F2P PvP world.....would have increased Yew tree's place.

Al-kharid mine to have a reduction of 1 adamantite rock on all worlds except skill total worlds + future PvP world.
Increase of 1 adamantite rock on both F2P skill total worlds....

Karamja dock closed except for Both F2P skill total worlds & future PvP world.Wilderness would still offer a place
to catch lobster's & swordfish....

F2P Mining guild closed off unless on a F2P skill total world or future F2P PvP world.

PvP.....


Giants placed around the rune rocks & in the BLK Fortress....groups of 3....skill total & Pking worlds...308 / 316.

10-sec teleport timer added to both pking worlds 308 & 316......could be extended further.

I would like to see the
*Rune Dagger*
have it's attack speed increased from
2.4 sec to 1.8 sec in order to better compete with the Range to R2h combat.....

Fire blast spell damage increase + 3-4 in F2P PvP only in single combat zone in the wilderness when
cast on another player not Npc.

Let staffs remember the last spell / defence settings you configured when switching to R2H or Giant Club.....
What do you call a
wolf
, that eats another
wolf
....?
For the correct answer ,
click here
.

04-Jan-2017 16:21:55 - Last edited on 04-Jan-2017 16:22:31 by dupe you

dupe you

dupe you

Posts: 2,355Mithril Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Many F2P PvPer's have noticed the amount of 85-99 def / 85-99 range that sit out above edge.

These are usually owned by a player who also has a 1 def pure or a 60 attack pure that only fights No-armour.

The problem lies if you attack one of these pure's without asking permission....I mean they stand there in full rune with a skull but if you don't ask or go no armour it's now considered "Rushing"............

Once you have attacked one of these pure's there will always be one of their friends close by who will begin attacking you....They switch the protect prays on & eat to full HP after any damage.


The real problem lies in the amount of "Attack Bonus" rune armour still provides...It's 24 atm for wearing full rune with a maple short bow.......


I believe a Higher Negative bonus would be the solution to this epidemic.....I believe wearing full rune , range should offer a - 33 bonus to render armour useless for rangers.......

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ranger's in medieval times were known for the light & nimble agility...they never wore heavy clunky armour...it would affect their aim..Let alone how would you draw back on a bow wearing full plate armour.......?

Ranger's were known to wear light cloth like material & to engage in combat only as a last resort with a dagger......

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Please a higher negative bonus for rangers wearing armour other than dragon-hide......
But an update for the dagger's would counteract any loss the rangers would encounter.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

It's crushing to spend months , if not years on a account only to be bullied out by another build that has no purpose other than to kill your spirit.......Please help avoid more of this.
What do you call a
wolf
, that eats another
wolf
....?
For the correct answer ,
click here
.

07-Jan-2017 11:22:23

dupe you

dupe you

Posts: 2,355Mithril Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Original message details are unavailable.

If you were unable to use a bow whilst wearing any armour that isn't dragon-hide would solve this problem.
What do you call a
wolf
, that eats another
wolf
....?
For the correct answer ,
click here
.

08-Jan-2017 12:06:42

dupe you

dupe you

Posts: 2,355Mithril Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Original message details are unavailable.
dupe you

these tanks are made for one reason. to combat 1def pures.
i know it, you know it.

i will support you in raising the negative range bonus for melee armor
if we also make it so that all weapons need defence level of their tier
. :D
What do you call a
wolf
, that eats another
wolf
....?
For the correct answer ,
click here
.

08-Jan-2017 16:04:34

dupe you

dupe you

Posts: 2,355Mithril Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Original message details are unavailable.
RSOS EoC solution....

This would be an easy update to rejuvenate the risk back into PvP.....

The ability to wield any weapon would only be allowed if the player is wearing 3 pieces
of the same armour.......

So to wield a rune scimitar , the player would need to also be able wear 3 piece of rune armour.
Consisting only of a helm , plate body/chain , plate legs or kite shield.....

Without wearing a minimum of 3 piece of corresponding armour , the player would receive a message stating that they are unable to wield the weapon of their choice......

This would be great for P2P aswell....All the 60 attack pures with 1 defence would now need to wear 3 pieces of dragon armour ...(med/full helm , chain body , plate legs/skirt & or dragon sq shield....

Note**
metal gloves or defenders would not count towards the 3 piece armour rule given.......

This update would bring the end of 1 defence pking & also no armour fight.....I believe the demand for armour + weapons would dramatically increase as pkers stock up for sets......

This would make for great youtube videos aswell , now pkers would be fighting in some of the best armour + weapons the game have to offer.

Godswords would only be able to be wielded if the player is wearing 3 corresponding pieces of god armour...

The whip could transition somewhere into the melee barrows gear.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What do you call a
wolf
, that eats another
wolf
....?
For the correct answer ,
click here
.

12-Jan-2017 02:00:20

dupe you

dupe you

Posts: 2,355Mithril Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Original message details are unavailable.
Now for the second part of the update.....'

To wield any range weapon , the player would now need to be only wearing range armour.
If the player wielding a bow was wearing any melee armour , the player would recieve a message stating "You are unable to equip this armour right now".....

Same would go for melee , A melee fighter would only be allowed to wear melee armour & not cross over into range or magic gear...otherwise the player would recieve the same message of "You are unable to equip this armour right now"

Exactly the same with magic.....Robes / Ahrims...Hat , body , bottom & or shield would need to have 3 pieces of magic armour equiped in order to wield a staff.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This would bring the end to hybrids & allow the 3 combat classes to be able to fight in accordance to each others weaknesses
.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Prayer gear maybe an issue.....But I believe there is a solution.....Monks robes , are just that robes...
There are no violent monks in RS...So why should their robes be used in such a manner....

As for intiate & proselyte armours....These would be be allowed to be used within the realms of PvM ,
with any style of combat ( range , magic or melee ) but for PvP intiate would only allow the use of mithril weapons with its ( 20 def req ) whilst proselyte armour with its 30 def req only adamanite weapon could be used within PvP.......

So theoretically , a player would be able to PvM in the wilderness whilst wearing proselyte armour & wielding a whip.....but as soon as any PvP occurs , the whip would be rendered useless against the opponent whilst wearing proselyte armour & not barrows armour for the 70 defence requirement..

I believe these few change will make RSOS an even better place for now & our future.
What do you call a
wolf
, that eats another
wolf
....?
For the correct answer ,
click here
.

12-Jan-2017 02:00:35

dupe you

dupe you

Posts: 2,355Mithril Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
F2P battle mage gear will be required to combat the raggers that are ruining F2P wilderness...

Range has dragon hide at 40 def.....
Melee has Rune armour at 40 def.....

Magic has nothing...........

40 def will be required to wear the battle mage gear....
What do you call a
wolf
, that eats another
wolf
....?
For the correct answer ,
click here
.

13-Jan-2017 04:38:00

dupe you

dupe you

Posts: 2,355Mithril Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Original message details are unavailable.
I'd like the see the player actually drink from the vial & colour all the potions too properly in the animation.
What do you call a
wolf
, that eats another
wolf
....?
For the correct answer ,
click here
.

15-Jan-2017 02:17:21

dupe you

dupe you

Posts: 2,355Mithril Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Original message details are unavailable.
Just as the Hill Giant Club has the same stats as a R2H , besides the crush bonus......The Hill Giant Battle-Axe would have the same stats as a rune battle axe with the crush bonus........

Would be wield-able with a shield & added to Obor's drop list with a higher chance than the Giant Hill Club that exist already.
What do you call a
wolf
, that eats another
wolf
....?
For the correct answer ,
click here
.

16-Jan-2017 02:48:46

dupe you

dupe you

Posts: 2,355Mithril Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Original message details are unavailable.
I love to PvP above edgenville.....My only problem is after each fight , I need to die in order to recharge my 13 prayer....
At the moment , I can either suicide on another player & waste their food supplies , or I can suicide on 1 of the 4 guards at edgenville...
I have the edgenville respawn ( cost 5 mill )....So dying after each fight feels appropriate for me on F2P.

My solution is to introduce a "Death-Cake" to F2P..... This cake would be able to be eaten in 3 clicks just like any other cake but each piece of cake would cause the player to lose 5 hp.

The death cake would be just like a normal cake to make with a few key exceptions......

First of all the "Death-Cake" could only be cooked in the cooking guild whilst wearing a
golden chefs hat
& also a
golden apron
( to protect the player from the poison ).Also
golden gloves
.....

84 cooking would also be a requirement for the "Death-Cake".

The poison would be different from the poison from "Ernest the Chicken" quest & would only be located in the
Wilderness
at the "
Black Knights Fortress
" ...Located here...

I believe the requirement to wear the Golden chefs hat , apron & gloves in order to cook the cake will be a great improvement to the practicality of the clue scrolls rewards of P2P....Whilst giving the fear to bot users of losing their golden items if banned....

Death is an under-used mechanic of the game which I believe could have new life breathed into it.....
What do you call a
wolf
, that eats another
wolf
....?
For the correct answer ,
click here
.

19-Jan-2017 11:49:55

dupe you

dupe you

Posts: 2,355Mithril Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
The usual way most F2P PvPers pk above Edgenville ( 1 v 1 ) is for both parties to take damage to around 30 hp before they start eating....This is know as "Not safing".........Whilst this is not enforced it is embraced by about 95% for the PvP single zone population.......

My proposition for F2P PvP single zone is to enforce a combat mechanic that does not allow either player engaged in a fight in a single zone area to be able to eat unless their under 32 hitpoints....
This means both players fight would keep taking damage for the start of the fight without being able to eat.

A cool-down timer would need to be added , so whilst one player may be under 32hp & able to eat the cool-down timer on the other player which is 43 hp is not able to eat between the "Tic" it takes for the first player to eat....

This cool-down timer would be automatically removed if either opponent is KO-ed , too prevent being PJ-ed & not being able to eat.
What do you call a
wolf
, that eats another
wolf
....?
For the correct answer ,
click here
.

19-Jan-2017 14:57:47

dupe you

dupe you

Posts: 2,355Mithril Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
PvP Single-Zone Wild 308/318
Original message details are unavailable.
If all of the Wilderness on 308 & 318 was converted to single zone combat , No multi-combat would be allowed on either of these servers in the wilderness.....

Pros**

- Would make it harder to rag in PvP.
- Wilderness clan fights on these servers I believe would become alot more epic. Now clans would have to spread out & engage in 1 v 1 fights against other clans. This would allow for longer clan fights.
- Skillers would have a better opportunity to avoid clan deaths. ( As only fighting/running away 1 v 1 ).
-Bounty Hunters would have less of an ordeal of having to deal with a clan when searching for their opponent.

Cons**

- Some players may not like the change , but most aspects of both of these servers is 1 v 1 PvP.
- Clans may not welcome the change , but I believe that clan pking needs to be mixed up a bit , instead 30 heads following 1 leader , then spam clicking on another clan doing the exact same thing.
What do you call a
wolf
, that eats another
wolf
....?
For the correct answer ,
click here
.

19-Jan-2017 16:17:05

dupe you

dupe you

Posts: 2,355Mithril Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Protection Prayer Flicking

Protection Prayers are great for quests I guess & PvP in multi zones...But they're being abused in 1 v 1 PvP......

My suggestion is to add a delay timer of 1.7 seconds each time the protection prayer is turned on to help avoid this abuse.....

Protection Prayers flicking have become a big problem in L.M.S aswell , I think this would be a great solution for that side of the game too.

What do you call a
wolf
, that eats another
wolf
....?
For the correct answer ,
click here
.

01-Feb-2017 02:20:12

dupe you

dupe you

Posts: 2,355Mithril Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Any combat exp gained from PvP from another player in the wilderness would now may
toggle
-
able
for those who wish to not gain any exp.

Iron players already have this ability....

I believe this could be new big thing for PvP.....Now PKers would have the ability to
lock in
their combat stats when PvPing.

Great
for clan pking.... Now all your clan can stay at whichever combat is chosen so everyone can attack all enemies when given.

Great
for mages who wish to stay low lvl....

Great
for anti-raggers especially those in the mid 50-60 combat range....Now PKers would be able to make accounts that have high attack whilst staying at a low lvl to combat these high defence raggers.

Ability to make a low lvl Pker & hunt the millions of the arrow / fish collectors that run around above edge on pk servers.

Ability for accounts made with low HP to be able to stay low HP....(PC pures)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


I know P2P pures would have an unfair advantage over F2P made pures , so I also propose that a
new NPC
/
monster
be added that when killed offers no HP exp given when killed.

2 spawns of these new creatures would be made available for F2P.....1 in a safe area & another in the wilderness. Both would drop junk items ...maybe just bones.
What do you call a
wolf
, that eats another
wolf
....?
For the correct answer ,
click here
.

14-Feb-2017 09:14:50

dupe you

dupe you

Posts: 2,355Mithril Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Original message details are unavailable.
I believe this maybe a great addition to clan pking. Requiring
93 magic
to cast
Multiplayer Tele-Block
would be needed.

The
Multiplayer Tele-Block
would work in the same manner as Ice-Barrage does with a 3 x 3 square being targeted around the selected enemy.

Most F2P clans all play follow the leader....1 leader with 50 heads behind following.....With the addition of the new spell Multiplayer Tele-Block , the entire clan could be tele-blocked allowing for a full blown war to occur.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------


I also believe a counter should be added for tele-block requiring a high lvl magic spell to counter its affects.
What do you call a
wolf
, that eats another
wolf
....?
For the correct answer ,
click here
.

21-Feb-2017 07:16:49

dupe you

dupe you

Posts: 2,355Mithril Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Original message details are unavailable.
As the title states , I do firmly believe that all clue scrolls
Hard
/
Elite
/
Master
should only be offered to players by doing activities in the wilderness.

I receive an avalanche of
Hard clues
from the
Green Drags
above Edge & also great volumes of them from the
Rou
ges
Che
sts
.

Also received a plethora of
Elite
/
Master
clues from the Lava Dragons...

If it's good enough for
me
, I can only be left too believe it will be great for the community....

( Yes I'm aware the Wilderness offers double the rate of clue scrolls )...But I want the
Wilderness to offer the best rewards
, as it did in the beginning.

***
REMEMBER
- The only limits we set in RSOS , are the ones we set upon ourselves.
What do you call a
wolf
, that eats another
wolf
....?
For the correct answer ,
click here
.

06-Mar-2017 10:35:38

Quick find code: 322-323-184-65614746Back to Top