Forums

GWD instances compromise

Quick find code: 322-323-9-66081964

of 2
Str8cashjigg

Str8cashjigg

Posts: 742Steel Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Since people are asking for instances, I have a compromise. In exchange for spawning as many instances as the player desires, they must agree to letting the instance be PK-able. All players outside the instance would have a "peek open instances" option that would let them see the gear (including inventory) and RSN's of all players inside that instance so that they could hiscore them if need be. They would also be able to see the items on the floor being juggled, if any (although unable to pick them up until visible for them). Players could also choose to open up an instance without getting killcount or needing an ecumenical key if they agreed to skull (wears off 30 minutes after leaving the instance or upon death). This would serve as a nice alternative to avoid having to get ecumenical keys for those who dislike risking in the wilderness such as myself. The risk would prevent uniques from becoming easily farmable. Discuss. The ditch is gonna get endless repolls while sand buckets can pass the first poll and never be implemented. After the ditch passes the 7th poll attempt, it'll be implemented an hour before the poll closes because it's actually important. Deal with it.

08-Feb-2019 03:32:46

Str8cashjigg

Str8cashjigg

Posts: 742Steel Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
This is an instance. You could open up as many as you want. The only thing is that others could see you in that instance. The ditch is gonna get endless repolls while sand buckets can pass the first poll and never be implemented. After the ditch passes the 7th poll attempt, it'll be implemented an hour before the poll closes because it's actually important. Deal with it.

08-Feb-2019 16:25:21

Str8cashjigg

Str8cashjigg

Posts: 742Steel Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Sal J said:
Nobody would use it, and it would defeat the purpose behind instances.

No support.


So the purpose of instances is to be easyscape then? If you don't like the compromise, then I got a better one. No instances at all.
The ditch is gonna get endless repolls while sand buckets can pass the first poll and never be implemented. After the ditch passes the 7th poll attempt, it'll be implemented an hour before the poll closes because it's actually important. Deal with it.

08-Feb-2019 19:44:01

Etienne II
Feb Member 2018

Etienne II

Posts: 428Silver Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
I don't think this is a very good compromise/idea since it simply bring the wilderness to the GWD.

Besides, the point of having an instance is to have no interference at all, not the opposite.
The shadow of truth and justice will always triumph.

08-Feb-2019 21:35:24

Str8cashjigg

Str8cashjigg

Posts: 742Steel Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Etienne II said:
I don't think this is a very good compromise/idea since it simply bring the wilderness to the GWD.

Besides, the point of having an instance is to have no interference at all, not the opposite.


In that case, I have another compromise. No instances. Nubnubs should git gud and L2compete.
The ditch is gonna get endless repolls while sand buckets can pass the first poll and never be implemented. After the ditch passes the 7th poll attempt, it'll be implemented an hour before the poll closes because it's actually important. Deal with it.

09-Feb-2019 00:53:37

Etienne II
Feb Member 2018

Etienne II

Posts: 428Silver Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Str8cashjigg said:
Etienne II said:
I don't think this is a very good compromise/idea since it simply bring the wilderness to the GWD.

Besides, the point of having an instance is to have no interference at all, not the opposite.


In that case, I have another compromise. No instances. Nubnubs should git gud and L2compete.


Why bother then?
The shadow of truth and justice will always triumph.

09-Feb-2019 01:39:19

FisherGaming

FisherGaming

Posts: 5,103Rune Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Etienne II said:
Why bother then?
This was never a genuine suggestion in the first place. It's just a retaliatory post made to an actually decent suggestion.

See something you disagree with? Make an utterly ridiculous suggestion mocking the idea by taking it to the extreme, then add PKing somehow!

When people say you're trolling, respond to them by calling them a nubnub, then say they should stop derailing your thread!
I'll keep score from now on.
A: 3 | M: -1 | Tr: 0 | Tu: -2 |

09-Feb-2019 03:27:11 - Last edited on 09-Feb-2019 03:28:00 by FisherGaming

Str8cashjigg

Str8cashjigg

Posts: 742Steel Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Etienne II said:
Str8cashjigg said:
Etienne II said:
I don't think this is a very good compromise/idea since it simply bring the wilderness to the GWD.

Besides, the point of having an instance is to have no interference at all, not the opposite.


In that case, I have another compromise. No instances. Nubnubs should git gud and L2compete.


Why bother then?


I wanted to see if people had a genuine excuse to support instances besides their easyscape and incompetence to git gud and L2compete. I was convinced that there was no excuse, but now I have confirmed it.
The ditch is gonna get endless repolls while sand buckets can pass the first poll and never be implemented. After the ditch passes the 7th poll attempt, it'll be implemented an hour before the poll closes because it's actually important. Deal with it.

09-Feb-2019 19:40:27

Quick find code: 322-323-9-66081964Back to Top