Forums

Partyhats on Treasure Hunter!!

Quick find code: 366-367-655-65817896

of 200
Whatusaytome

Whatusaytome

Posts: 5,616Rune Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
If simply being the same shape would be enough to demolish the prices of the most valuable rare in game, then explain to me why the Black Santa did not demolish the Red Santa. but instead only made both more valuable over time.

Now I specifically said make them graphically different than remaining partyhats. which means there will be changes in how the item would look an a character, changes on how it looks in the inventory.

the items base design for how it looks as an inventory item can easily be very different, like how they remade the design on rings. obviously different than before and it looks like a brand new item.

You cannot say an idea will trash the most valuable rare in the game without a real justification and example.
Your opinions here can affect us all. Please post for the better

Stepping Stone Partyhats
Update the rules, Trade Lock Scammers

28-Nov-2016 20:09:52

Draco Burnz
Dec Gold Premier Club Member 2011

Draco Burnz

Posts: 64,599Emerald Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Lee M said:
your supporters list is (for the most part) just a bunch of titles that are in-game that you've ripped from the rs wiki, lmao.


Speaking of which, i never supported this so im asking nicely to please remove my name.

Draco Burnz said:
Id only agree if they made them mems only;)


If this is what you took as a support, it was clearly sarcasm.
Draco Burnz
True Collector of Cosmetics
7th year VIP 2013-2019

Support and

28-Nov-2016 21:32:26 - Last edited on 28-Nov-2016 21:35:23 by Draco Burnz

Blackwing
Nov Member 2012

Blackwing

Posts: 39,859Sapphire Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Burak said:
I wouldn't mind if partyhats became untradeable but i know people that will. I mean it's a little too late for change. Safest option is to keep things how they are.

Sometimes it's better to take the risk, just look at EoC :P I mean if any of the discontinued rares that I have were tradeable, I'd definitely support making them untradeable. Money can be made elsewhere and the feels are better when they're not associated with money.
Cool Bump™ Service
|| "An immortal demands you fulfill three wishes, and you've the gall to propose a round of gwent?"

28-Nov-2016 22:25:03

Blackwing
Nov Member 2012

Blackwing

Posts: 39,859Sapphire Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Lee M said:
your supporters list is (for the most part) just a bunch of titles that are in-game that you've ripped from the rs wiki, lmao.

Look closer, you might see a pattern... ;)

Draco Burnz said:
Draco Burnz said:
Id only agree if they made them mems only;)


If this is what you took as a support, it was clearly sarcasm.

Tbf, what's supposed to indicate sarcasm there? Without the winkie face, it'd be impossible to tell whether it's sarcasm or not, and even with it, you know, I've seen you use winkie face lots of times before where you haven't been sarcastic.

If you don't want to risk mistaken for being serious, just use the "/s". ;)
Cool Bump™ Service
|| "An immortal demands you fulfill three wishes, and you've the gall to propose a round of gwent?"

28-Nov-2016 22:31:34

Draco Burnz
Dec Gold Premier Club Member 2011

Draco Burnz

Posts: 64,599Emerald Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Blackwing said:
Tbf, what's supposed to indicate sarcasm there? Without the winkie face, it'd be impossible to tell whether it's sarcasm or not, and even with it, you know, I've seen you use winkie face lots of times before where you haven't been sarcastic.

If you don't want to risk mistaken for being serious, just use the "/s"


Yet if you look at most of my other posts its clear i dont support this.

Plus my first ever post was this:

Draco Burnz said:
No support.


So please tell me how he couldve mistaken it?
Draco Burnz
True Collector of Cosmetics
7th year VIP 2013-2019

Support and

28-Nov-2016 22:43:59 - Last edited on 28-Nov-2016 22:46:26 by Draco Burnz

Blackwing
Nov Member 2012

Blackwing

Posts: 39,859Sapphire Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Draco Burnz said:
Yet if you look at most of my other posts its clear i dont support this.

Plus my first ever post was this:

Draco Burnz said:
No support.


So please tell me how he couldve mistaken it?

People can change their minds, and so I only looked at the post you first pointed out; don't just assume that I've read even most of the replies on a thread with over 300 posts :P
Cool Bump™ Service
|| "An immortal demands you fulfill three wishes, and you've the gall to propose a round of gwent?"

28-Nov-2016 22:54:05

Turksta
Jul Member 2019

Turksta

Posts: 3,539Adamant Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Whatusaytome said:
If simply being the same shape would be enough to demolish the prices of the most valuable rare in game, then explain to me why the Black Santa did not demolish the Red Santa. but instead only made both more valuable over time.

Now I specifically said make them graphically different than remaining partyhats. which means there will be changes in how the item would look an a character, changes on how it looks in the inventory.

the items base design for how it looks as an inventory item can easily be very different, like how they remade the design on rings. obviously different than before and it looks like a brand new item.

You cannot say an idea will trash the most valuable rare in the game without a real justification and example.

Personally given the high price of these items, i just want the creators of the game to leave partyhats alone.
Also black santa hat has a different design to the original santa hat.

29-Nov-2016 06:28:00

Whatusaytome

Whatusaytome

Posts: 5,616Rune Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Turksta said:
Whatusaytome said:
If simply being the same shape would be enough to demolish the prices of the most valuable rare in game, then explain to me why the Black Santa did not demolish the Red Santa. but instead only made both more valuable over time.

Now I specifically said make them graphically different than remaining partyhats. which means there will be changes in how the item would look an a character, changes on how it looks in the inventory.

the items base design for how it looks as an inventory item can easily be very different, like how they remade the design on rings. obviously different than before and it looks like a brand new item.

You cannot say an idea will trash the most valuable rare in the game without a real justification and example.

Personally given the high price of these items, i just want the creators of the game to leave partyhats alone.
Also black santa hat has a different design to the original santa hat.


so you are saying that a graphically different item being added to the game has actually made an in-game rare rise in value, despite still being a santa hat and looking like a santa hat only of a different color? strange, this sounds like the example outcome of what im suggesting. only my idea doesn't add rares or tradables. hmmm maybe we should make them tradable so the prices rise more like this santa hat example.

but I still think tradables is a bad idea in general because #richgetricher
Your opinions here can affect us all. Please post for the better

Stepping Stone Partyhats
Update the rules, Trade Lock Scammers

29-Nov-2016 15:41:52

Jokku23

Jokku23

Posts: 32,117Sapphire Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Lee M said:
your supporters list is (for the most part) just a bunch of titles that are in-game that you've ripped from the rs wiki, lmao.

No!
………. ,*˜*, ……. ,•°*•, … You'll … ,•*°•, …… ,*˜*, .………
„*˜……“• •“………'·,¸¸,‘•°. thank .°•',¸¸,·'……..“• •“……˜*„
……………………………………………………………………..
The Bible of Rimmington
“‹„¸¸„ •°`' · . ,¸¸, . · ‘ … me later … ' · . ,¸¸, . · '´°•„¸¸„›“

29-Nov-2016 17:47:12

Quick find code: 366-367-655-65817896Back to Top