Forums

Pathetic Poll ResultsThread is locked

Quick find code: 317-318-130-66080406

of 3
Reminiscon
Oct Member 2016

Reminiscon

Posts: 3,298Adamant Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
So let me get this straight, blessed d hide chaps having their DEF requirement removed, which is completely harmless since black d hide chaps also have no DEF requirement, fails with like 23% support...

And the Serp Helm buff, which btw is completely unnecessary since +4 is more than enough to be BIS, passes being boosted from +3 to +5 with 80%?

The poll results just get shittier and shittier as this community declines in quality. Not a single care for the integrity of this game, they just hate PKers and want the rest of the game made even easier and to promote as much power creep as possible.

It's not new content I am against. It's watching a great game slowly be turned into a pile of trash with no real death mechanics, unnecessary buffs, no respect given to Pures, overblown catering to Ironmen, and the list goes on.


RS3 players are starting to leak over here, an inevitable outcome of a collapsing game. What happens when you're next in line to be thrown to the dust?

It's time we adapt inalienable principles of game integrity NOW. No majority should be able to over-ride the core principle of preserving the health of the game.
Long live the Wilderness. Long live risk vs reward in PVM. Long live 2006.

01-Feb-2019 16:26:16 - Last edited on 01-Feb-2019 16:28:20 by Reminiscon

MasterMeowgi
Dec Gold Premier Club Member 2016

MasterMeowgi

Posts: 414Silver Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Relax dude. Don't blame a group of players just because you didn't get your fashionscape. It's the community that voted for it. Not ironmen, not rs3 players, the community as a whole.

Personally, I'm an ironman and I voted yes for chaps and vambs because I don't care, it doesn't effect me or pures in any way. If anything, it increases their risk. Even though I hate the wilderness and pk'ing in general.

If you want to blame anyone, blame that portion of pk'ers who are considered the most toxic demographic of the player base.

01-Feb-2019 21:49:29

Boabies
Dec Member 2018

Boabies

Posts: 2,495Mithril Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
MasterMeowgi said:
Relax dude. Don't blame a group of players just because you didn't get your fashionscape. It's the community that voted for it. Not ironmen, not rs3 players, the community as a whole.

Personally, I'm an ironman and I voted yes for chaps and vambs because I don't care, it doesn't effect me or pures in any way. If anything, it increases their risk. Even though I hate the wilderness and pk'ing in general.

If you want to blame anyone, blame that portion of pk'ers who are considered the most toxic demographic of the player base.


Yes, but this is the community who voted to allow in botting. They're not worthy of deciding the game's future. Regardless, if you wanna be toxic towards PKers, then don't expect Jagex to show any form of mercy when they unleash another revs episode where they promise to remove statuettes and don't in the end.
Since luring nubnubs into the wilderness to be victims won't work, we should force them to anti-PK by preventing them from leaving the wilderness until they PK a couple of targets.

02-Feb-2019 02:59:35

TBowSpawnPls
Nov Member 2018

TBowSpawnPls

Posts: 5,197Rune Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
MasterMeowgi said:
Relax dude. Don't blame a group of players just because you didn't get your fashionscape. It's the community that voted for it. Not ironmen, not rs3 players, the community as a whole.

Personally, I'm an ironman and I voted yes for chaps and vambs because I don't care, it doesn't effect me or pures in any way. If anything, it increases their risk. Even though I hate the wilderness and pk'ing in general.

If you want to blame anyone, blame that portion of pk'ers who are considered the most toxic demographic of the player base.
The thing is though that all wilderness content is 100% optional. Non-pkers getting upset about getting killed in a pvp area is the most ridiculous thing I've ever seen.

Hopefully soon they decide to limit poll questions to people that actually engage in content being polled. They already said that they're thinking of allowing ironman only polls, so if they do that surely they'll do the same for pkers.
Troll: A person that holds an opinion other than the most popular opinion on a forum, apparently**
*******************************;<~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

02-Feb-2019 03:30:24

Boabies
Dec Member 2018

Boabies

Posts: 2,495Mithril Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Besides, this is the internet. Oversensitive ex-RS3 spin buying 12 year olds really have no place in this game. Since luring nubnubs into the wilderness to be victims won't work, we should force them to anti-PK by preventing them from leaving the wilderness until they PK a couple of targets.

02-Feb-2019 04:40:14

Notcool97
Dec Member 2016

Notcool97

Posts: 932Gold Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
TBowSpawnPls said:
MasterMeowgi said:
Relax dude. Don't blame a group of players just because you didn't get your fashionscape. It's the community that voted for it. Not ironmen, not rs3 players, the community as a whole.

Personally, I'm an ironman and I voted yes for chaps and vambs because I don't care, it doesn't effect me or pures in any way. If anything, it increases their risk. Even though I hate the wilderness and pk'ing in general.

If you want to blame anyone, blame that portion of pk'ers who are considered the most toxic demographic of the player base.
The thing is though that all wilderness content is 100% optional. Non-pkers getting upset about getting killed in a pvp area is the most ridiculous thing I've ever seen.

Hopefully soon they decide to limit poll questions to people that actually engage in content being polled. They already said that they're thinking of allowing ironman only polls, so if they do that surely they'll do the same for pkers.
Saying all wilderness content is optional would be the same as saying being a pure and limiting your defence is optional. You can't get the bis magic cape without going to the wilderness, just as you can't wear blessed d hide without leveling your defence.

If they limit voting rights based off the activity, maybe they should limit votes adjusting the stats of clue scroll items like blessed d'hide to people who have done 250+ clue scrolls. Maybe they will poll new, superior chins to black chins in a safe zone and limit votes to people with 80+ hunter. Maybe they will add new rcing methods better than the abyss and limit votes to people with 90+ rc. Maybe they will poll making revs a single combat zone limiting the vote to people that kill revs (and not the people that kill rev killers) etc. See the issue with limiting votes yet? It won't seem like such a brilliant idea when they decide to take away *your* vote.

02-Feb-2019 11:45:31 - Last edited on 02-Feb-2019 11:46:54 by Notcool97

Iron Robsham
Aug Gold Premier Club Member 2018

Iron Robsham

Posts: 151Iron Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
I've gotta say, it's pretty ironic seeing some of the people that are so toxic towards ironmen get so butthurt about people being toxic towards PKers. Unfortunately I'm sure the lesson won't be learned, that toxicity breeds toxicity and there's no point crying when your own toxicity comes back to bite you in the arse. "Everything I want that will never pass a poll in a million years is an integrity issue!" No. Get over yourself.

02-Feb-2019 14:19:57

Str8cashjigg

Str8cashjigg

Posts: 742Steel Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Iron Robsham said:
I've gotta say, it's pretty ironic seeing some of the people that are so toxic towards ironmen get so butthurt about people being toxic towards PKers. Unfortunately I'm sure the lesson won't be learned, that toxicity breeds toxicity and there's no point crying when your own toxicity comes back to bite you in the arse.


It's not just that tbh. Notcool doesn't like catering towards either group but yes, I do agree that the two groups don't get along very well. Now before we go further, I will state that you're a respectable ironman since you understand that the game shouldn't be catered around y'all.

Also, pures actually serve a purpose which is why they chose that gameplay style. Ironmen aren't forced to play that gameplay style in order to achieve the goal that they're trying to achieve. Pures can't PK how they want to without having 1 defense. Ironmen chose the game mode for the sense of accomplishment which in itself implies that there should be challenges. Difference is that one warrants a hard game mode whereas the other deserves a bit more catering imo.

Also, I gave up on this community. It's way too divided to be allowed to decide shit. You have this, skillers hating PvMers for their drop tables, and a lot more.
The ditch is gonna get endless repolls while sand buckets can pass the first poll and never be implemented. After the ditch passes the 7th poll attempt, it'll be implemented an hour before the poll closes because it's actually important. Deal with it.

02-Feb-2019 14:55:18

XIRang3mag3I
May Member 2017

XIRang3mag3I

Posts: 551Steel Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Reminiscon said:
So let me get this straight, blessed d hide chaps having their DEF requirement removed, which is completely harmless since black d hide chaps also have no DEF requirement, fails with like 23% support...

And the Serp Helm buff, which btw is completely unnecessary since +4 is more than enough to be BIS, passes being boosted from +3 to +5 with 80%?

The poll results just get shittier and shittier as this community declines in quality. Not a single care for the integrity of this game, they just hate PKers and want the rest of the game made even easier and to promote as much power creep as possible.

It's not new content I am against. It's watching a great game slowly be turned into a pile of trash with no real death mechanics, unnecessary buffs, no respect given to Pures, overblown catering to Ironmen, and the list goes on.


RS3 players are starting to leak over here, an inevitable outcome of a collapsing game. What happens when you're next in line to be thrown to the dust?

It's time we adapt inalienable principles of game integrity NOW. No majority should be able to over-ride the core principle of preserving the health of the game.
Ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha. L2notlimit your accounts nubnub. Just because you think it’s a principle of integrity doesn’t make it one.

02-Feb-2019 16:24:12

Quick find code: 317-318-130-66080406Back to Top