Forums

FMR - A broken systemThread is locked

Quick find code: 278-279-285-65718397

of 27
Southeaster
Nov Gold Premier Club Member 2014

Southeaster

Posts: 15,020Opal Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
2_Tron said:
Ownage said:
Still no response from Jagex lol typical.


Although you've waited for responses from Jagex you've been watching at the wrong places for seeing the results you've been looking for.
Those responses have been there all the time and continiously being offered however so far you didn't noticed.

[citation needed]
whoever is humming the jaws theme is gonna get slapped

04-Mar-2016 23:53:06

2_Tron

2_Tron

Posts: 18,496Opal Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Mod Kalaya said:
Vivy - Trust trading is when players must trade without receiving anything, on the understanding that they'll receive something else that is not possible to trade in the same trade window. This is not allowed on the forums because of the large amount of scamming that was ongoing when it was allowed. Fmod action was correct.

Vivy - It was locked due to gravebumping, as the latest post was made 2 months after the post before. Gravenumping is against the code of conduct, so the FMod action was correct.

LiberTPhoral - This will not be written down because it changes from forum to forum. Apologies, but that's the nature of this beast.

Kiara - I have reversed the decision as you've advised.


Thanks,


Just one I easily could extract from the 'Forum Moderation Review'-thread but the golden posts made there contain more of this kind of stuff.

As for 'rude moderators' there aren't any to find at the moment and I am sure those 'Moderators themselves' are looking out for it, that it won't happen again in the future.

As for 'we always see the same Moderators', there's a constant mix & exchange of different Moderators so it's not obvious anymore who is in and who isn't, even JMods take part in it.

There's enough to cite but I don't gonna quote it in here as you can see for yourself if you care to look around throughout the whole Forums.

05-Mar-2016 09:31:26

2_Tron

2_Tron

Posts: 18,496Opal Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Original message details are unavailable.
*dancing for gold post*

I mean bump :P


...

Original message details are unavailable.
Woo! The dancing had finally paid off :P

I do hope that we get to see the kind of layout that is on the Community Home specific rules page. Nice titles that match the forum layout and quite extensive with everything that we need to know.


Just an example of how Players have been used to deal with 'Old Times Sake'.

Ownage said:
Still no response from Jagex lol typical.


^ Some, or maybe more, JMods prefer to do things a dynamic way, just different, prefer to do the work for you right away and not spill too much time posting 'we will be going to do this for you'.
It saves them from making promises they can't deliver because something else crossed it not letting them fullfill yours wishes at that time so they need to postpone it because theirs boss says so.

05-Mar-2016 09:42:18

Anger Alt
Jul Gold Premier Club Member 2018

Anger Alt

Posts: 16,548Opal Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
2_Tron said:
Mod Kalaya said:
Kiara - I have reversed the decision as you've advised.


Thanks,


Just one I easily could extract from the 'Forum Moderation Review'-thread but the golden posts made there contain more of this kind of stuff.

It's always good to see FMR working out. Compared to before, the last few FMR gold posts seem to have been more generous towards players. I hope Jagex keep it up.

(I had this opinion before my own report was considered too). :P
Kiara |
Players Vs F-Mods
|
Old School Updates
|
Forum Suggestions

05-Mar-2016 09:50:38

2_Tron

2_Tron

Posts: 18,496Opal Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
I can assure you there are a lot of Teams within Jagex that do discuss a lot of issues, concerning Moderation of The RuneScape Community / The Forums / Social Media, how to better the circumstances and improve, so we all have a better future.
Some things have not an easy cheap solution but need a longer thoughtful consideration and that's taken care of but you have to wait for the moment they have found a better solution.

05-Mar-2016 09:56:30

Southeaster
Nov Gold Premier Club Member 2014

Southeaster

Posts: 15,020Opal Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
First of all, Lnkmiegel, thanks for backing up what you claim, I thought at first you were just trying to be funny.
2_Tron said:
Just one I easily could extract from the 'Forum Moderation Review'-thread but the golden posts made there contain more of this kind of stuff.

Well, it does show that having FMR around is better than no FMR at all. I still personally believe that only FMod actions that are totally beyond the pale are reversed, but I'm not going to say that I speak for most people, neither have I looked into those incidents the FMR report was actioned.
2_Tron said:
As for 'rude moderators' there aren't any to find at the moment and I am sure those 'Moderators themselves' are looking out for it, that it won't happen again in the future.

Now, this I take issue with.
This thread is the most recent example that I know of a moderator being rude. And here's a reply on FMR, at around the same time:
Mod Matthe said:
FMods are forum users too. While the posting style is abrasive it is far from unmodly behaviour.

This is still a problem. Personally for me it's a issue as serious as the player's point of view not being considered in FMR.
2_Tron said:
Some, or maybe more, JMods prefer to do things a dynamic way, just different, prefer to do the work for you right away and not spill too much time posting 'we will be going to do this for you'.
It saves them from making promises they can't deliver because something else crossed it not letting them fullfill yours wishes at that time so they need to postpone it because theirs boss says so.

You know, I suppose that's possible. The pessimist in me, however, believes they would rather keep things as they are, hence the refusal to say anything.
whoever is humming the jaws theme is gonna get slapped

05-Mar-2016 12:10:59

Averia Light

Averia Light

Posts: 26,966Sapphire Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
I guess my only issue with the abrasive behavior being considered modly is that jagex also made a point to say that moderators pretty much have to like the company, because why would someone volunteer for a company they didn't like. Ive also seen mods demodded for being antijagex.

If behavior didn't matter, then why would the behavior of not liking the company matter? If anything I would think that abrasive behavior towards players would be considered far more unmodly than the players opinion of jagex.

No source because lol years ago.
You're the right kind of madness

05-Mar-2016 13:04:05 - Last edited on 05-Mar-2016 13:05:53 by Averia Light

2_Tron

2_Tron

Posts: 18,496Opal Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Averia Light said:
I guess my only issue with the abrasive behavior being considered modly is that jagex also made a point to say that moderators pretty much have to like the company, because why would someone volunteer for a company they didn't like. Ive also seen mods demodded for being antijagex.

If behavior didn't matter, then why would the behavior of not liking the company matter? If anything I would think that abrasive behavior towards players would be considered far more unmodly than the players opinion of jagex.

No source because lol years ago
.


Nice to see it has been dealt with. :)

05-Mar-2016 13:17:35

Averia Light

Averia Light

Posts: 26,966Sapphire Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Lol

Yes because it dropped of the forums it didn't happen. Using that logic, since rants is back and there are no jmod quotes saying it went away, clearly rants was never removed at all.

Jagex logic amirite?
You're the right kind of madness

05-Mar-2016 13:31:05 - Last edited on 05-Mar-2016 13:32:28 by Averia Light

Quick find code: 278-279-285-65718397Back to Top